Project Labor Agreement News Round-Up

  • The Bulletin continued to cover the Pennsylvania Department of General Services’ decision to require a PLA on the $400 million Graterford prison project. Additionally, the Southeast Pennsylvania chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors launched a marketing campaign to inform the public about the impact of the Graterford prison project PLA on local workers and the community.
  • San Diego radio station KPBS has an online report detailing the “bad news” that the San Diego Unified School District received last week from Associated General Countractors – San Diego President Jim Ryan.   It looks like trying to discriminate against 80 percent of California’s private construction workforce is an easy way for a school district to find itself in court.
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks

One Comment

  1. Kan Hambrick
    Posted August 13, 2009 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    PLAs are a rip off of public funds. Projects cost about 20% more with a PLA in place. 80% of contractors are non-union. They do as good a job as unionized firms. They are effectually barred from bidding on contracts that require a PLA.

    Politicians who grant PLAs should be voted out of office. They are not properly representing their constituents and the use of their money.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Home Get the Truth About Us Home Sign Up To Get Email Alerts About PLAs Send Us A Tip! Help Us Tell The Truth About This Critical Issue